Cty. of maui v. haw. wildlife fund
WebNov 6, 2024 · County of Maui, Hawaii Respondent Hawaii Wildlife Fund Docket no. 18-260 Decided by Roberts Court Lower court United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Citation 590 US _ (2024) Granted Feb 19, 2024 Argued Nov 6, 2024 Decided Apr 23, … John Rapanos sought to fill in three wetland areas on his property in order to build a … WebCounty of Maui v. Hawai'i Wildlife Fund United States Supreme Court 140 S. Ct. 1462 (2024) Facts The Clean Water Act (CWA) prohibits the discharge of pollutants from a …
Cty. of maui v. haw. wildlife fund
Did you know?
WebJul 19, 2024 · In County of Maui v. Hawai‘i Wildlife Fund , the Supreme Court considered whether the Clean Water Act requires a permit for the discharge of a pollutant from … WebHawaii Wildlife Fund et al v. County of Maui Doc. 34 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII HAWAI`I WILDLIFE FUND, a Hawaii non …
WebCty. of Maui v. Haw. Wildlife Fund, 140 S. Ct. 1462, 1471 (2024). Along the same lines, the Clean Air Act assigns “primary responsibility” for control-ling air pollution to the States. 42 U.S.C. §7401(a)(3). There is, however, one important issue on which the federal government takes the lead: it bears pri- ... WebJul 23, 2024 · After implementing SCOTUS’ guidance, the district court reached the same decision it did in 2014: The county of Maui was required to obtain an NPDES permit for its wastewater injection wells at a...
WebHaw. Wildlife Fund v. Cty. of Maui, No. 12-00198 SOM/KJM, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 131803, at *30 (D. Haw. July 15, 2024).1 The ruling holds national importance as the first instance in which a court has applied the Supreme Court’s “functional equivalent” test for when pollutant discharges that reach WebOct 12, 2024 · 8 HAWAI‘I WILDLIFE FUND V. CTY. OF MAUI In its second order, the district court held the County liable as to Wells 1 and 2 based largely on the same reasons it found the County liable on Wells 3 and 4. Haw. Wildlife Fund v. Cty. of Maui, Civil No. 12-00198 SOM/BMK, 2015 WL 328227, at *5–6 (D. Haw. Jan. 23, 2015). The court
WebMar 16, 2024 · See Haw. Wildlife Fund v. Cty. of Maui, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 131803 (D. Hawaii July 15, 2024). Applying the seven County of Maui factors, plus an additional factor as to the volume of the pollutants discharge, the district court concluded as a matter of law that the County had violated the CWA by failing to obtain an NPDES permit for ...
cuny pre healthWebCty. of Maui v. Haw. Wildlife Fund Supreme Court of the United States November 6, 2024, Argued; April 23, 2024, Decided No. 18-260. Reporter 206 L. Ed. 2d 640 *; 2024 U.S. … cuny portal accountWebAug 11, 2024 · Cty. of Maui v. Haw. Wildlife Fund, 140 S. Ct. 1462, 1474 (2024). *7 Interior argues that the Jorjani Opinion brings uniformity to a “patchwork of legal standards created over a period of decades by contradictory judicial decisions.” Defs.’ Reply (Dkt. 87) at 1. That is unpersuasive on two fronts. cuny postingCounty of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, No. 18-260, 590 U.S. ___ (2024), was a United States Supreme Court case involving pollution discharges under the Clean Water Act (CWA). The case asked whether the Clean Water Act requires a permit when pollutants that originate from a non-point source can be traced to reach navigable waters through mechanisms such as groundwater transport. In a 6–3 decision, the Court ruled that such non-point discharges require a permit wh… cuny portal blackboard loginWebronmental Law: (1) Cty. of Maui v. Haw. Wildlife Fund, 140 S. Ct. 1462, 206 L. Ed. 2d 640 (2024) (The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that an NPDES permit is required for a point source that discharges pollutants into navi-gable waters through an intermediary nonpoint source, such as groundwa-ter, if that discharge is a “functional cuny populationWebNov 6, 2024 · Clarence Thomas • Neil Gorsuch • Samuel Alito. County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund is a case argued before the Supreme Court of the United States on … cuny press releaseWebApr 23, 2024 · The Ninth Circuit’s opinion below held that a NPDES permit was required when a pollutant was “fairly traceable” from a point source to a navigable water. Haw. Wildlife Fund v. Cty. of Maui, 886 F.3d 737, 749 (9th Cir. 2024). The Supreme Court found that this test was too broad. cuny printing